{"id":2905,"date":"2024-03-26T03:02:36","date_gmt":"2024-03-26T03:02:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/?p=2905"},"modified":"2024-03-26T03:02:36","modified_gmt":"2024-03-26T03:02:36","slug":"lunatic-bracketology-results-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/?p=2905","title":{"rendered":"Lunatic Bracketology Results"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Well &#8211; while I am sure all of us are ready for Thursday to be here and have the Sweet 16 begin, it is Monday.  I thought about blogging about some of the women&#8217;s tournament games (there are a couple of really good ones &#8211; as UCLA is only up 2 against Creighton, and Iowa is only up 5 against West Virginia).  But then I realized, I have tons of material to catch up on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now that the games of the first weekend are over with, and I am not trying to handicap 52 games, I should go back and check up on how my bracketology did.  This is always a nervous moment for me &#8211; as I hate the idea of not doing a good job.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This year, I have two things to check &#8211; my bracketology, and my imaginary committee&#8217;s bracketology.  I got 66 of 68 teams right &#8211; while my committee only got 65 of 68 teams.  So, it appears that I am better on my own than with a whole bunch of models.  Before we compare against the media, lets quickly talk about who I selected wrong.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Basically, I missed on Mississippi State and Virginia.  Lets face it &#8211; I wanted UVa to get in, but I didn&#8217;t expect them to get in with their metrics.  And as for Mississippi State, I figured with all the bid stealers, a team that didn&#8217;t go better than 50% in their conference would get eliminated.  But apparently, the committee went with the metrics on MSU and ignored the metrics for Virginia &#8211; who would have guess that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>My committee got MSU right (because it was a lot more tied to the metrics), but missed on Virginia, Texas A&amp;M and Northwestern.  So &#8211; not the best.  If I ever do this exercise again, I will need to really improve the metrics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>My comparison method uses the scoring method from the Bracket Matrix &#8211; this is for two reasons &#8211; it is as sensible as any other metric, and it tracks so many people&#8217;s brackets that the media picks are already scored.  You get 3 points for selecting the team correctly, 2 points for getting the seed correct, and 1 point for getting a team within 1 seed line.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For my picks, I selected 66 teams correctly (198 points), got 40 teams seeded exactly correct (80 points), and 60 teams seeded within 1 seed (60 points).  338 points is not bad for me &#8211; it is in the middle of the bracket matrix &#8211; definitely not the best, but certainly not the worst.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The committee did not do as well.  It only got 65 correct (195 points), 35 teams seeded exactly correct (70 points), and 57 within 1 seed (57 points) for only 322 points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So &#8211; I crushed my imaginary committee.  A little sad for me because while it shows that I can do better than some statistics, I had high hopes that the statistics would make my seeding better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Anyways &#8211; the real question isn&#8217;t how I did against the entire bracket matrix &#8211; it is how I did against the media.  And it turns out &#8211; not that bad.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>FOX &#8211; Mike Decourcy &#8211; 345 (67, 41, 62)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Sports Illustrated &#8211; Kevin Sweeney &#8211; 344 (67, 41, 61)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>THE LUNATIC &#8211; 338 (66, 40, 60)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Sporting News &#8211; Bill Bender &#8211; 337 (67, 38, 60)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ESPN &#8211; Joe Lunardi &#8211; 336 (67, 38, 59)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>USA Today &#8211; Paul Myerberg, Erick Smith and Eddie Timanus332 (67, 36, 59)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>CBS &#8211; Jerry Palm &#8211; 323 (66, 35, 55)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>LUNATIC COMMITTEE &#8211; 322 (65, 35, 57)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>So, congratulations to Mike Decourcy &#8211; as while I don&#8217;t know of all the media members that create a bracket prediction, he did the best of the media members I was tracking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, the Lunatic is extremely pleased &#8211; while I got one less correct than ESPN&#8217;s Joe Lunardi, I did such a better job at seeding that I beat him by 2 points.  And I crushed Jerry Palm from CBS (which is a shame &#8211; he had this great site that covered the RPI before moving to CBS).  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Regardless, any time the Lunatic can beat 4 of the 6 media members, that qualifies as a good job for the year.  Still a little disappointed that his committee idea crashed and burned &#8211; but glad that my last second change to put my committee vote as its own did so well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I will at some point have to clean up the bracketology page &#8211; it is still stuck on what it said Saturday morning&#8230;  There is only so much time in the day (and the Lunatic&#8217;s old age simply requires more sleep than he used to &#8211; he is still sleep deprived, just he needs more sleep to function).  That might be an after the tournament project (or a project for the week leading up to the Final Four &#8211; where we have to wait 5 full days for basketball to resume.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Well &#8211; while I am sure all of us are ready for Thursday to be here and have the Sweet 16 begin, it is Monday. I thought about blogging about some of the women&#8217;s tournament games (there are a couple of really good ones &#8211; as UCLA is only up 2 against Creighton, and Iowa [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[53],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2905","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2024-blog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2905"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2905\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2906,"href":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2905\/revisions\/2906"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tehodgson.com\/stompthelunatic\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}