So, as Illinois rolls into their Elite 8 game against Connecticut, I have severely mixed feelings.
Being from Chicago, I have several friends and family who went to Illinois for school. Illinois was one of the two schools I chose between for both my undergraduate and graduate studies – I was very happy at Purdue, but I knew that Illinois was also a great school.
That is why I am so conflicted. Because there is no doubt that Illinois would not be in the Elite 8 if it wasn’t for guard Terrence Shannon Jr. He is averaging 23.3 points per game – ranking 3rd amongst all Division I players. He is clearly a gifted athlete. But that is not the full story.
In December, Shannon was charged with rape for an alleged incident that took place in Kansas at a bar after the Kansas / Illinois football game. The allegations said that he summoned the woman over to him, grabbed her butt, reached under her skirt and inappropriately touched her. There were enough witnesses that the Douglas County district attorney’s office decide to press charges.
I was actually proud of what Illinois behind that. The university cited its zero-tolerance sexual misconduct policy and indefinitely suspended Shannon from all team activities including games. At the time, Illinois was ranked #9 in the country. In a world that it seems all that matters is winning, Illinois took the moral high ground and said that is not who they are.
That suspension lasted 30 days. Because Shannon sued the university saying that the university violated his civil rights – depriving him of an opportunity to be a high NBA draft pick and earn NIL endorsements. So, based on the lawsuit, Illinois had to re-instate him – and he has been on fire since, leading Illinois to the Elite 8.
The whole situation is sad. Don’t get me wrong – Shannon clearly deserves to have his day in court – our legal system presumes people are innocent until proven guilty. But that doesn’t mean he deserves to play basketball. It means he deserves not to go to jail until he gets to defend himself.
And he certainly has questions to answer. Why would he even be in a Lawrence bar that evening? I think it is crazy that he travelled to a football game that was multiple states away but I know some students would do this. But I probably wouldn’t be hanging out afterward in the bar scene potentially rubbing in that their school lost after the game. Not to mention the need to get back to campus for classes on Monday (naively realized the fact that classes are important is a ridiculous concept). Even if he is innocent, he certainly did not make good choices.
But the university followed their written student policy. The university could have just as easily expelled him, but they at least let him have a chance to defend himself. If you believe the players are students, there is nothing that states a student has a right to play a sport. If you believe the players are employees of the university, I am pretty sure that they don’t need a ton of reasons to fire an employee – especially if they have a written policy that states the rules.
Where does the slope end – does a player who doesn’t get enough playing time get to sue because it could stop them from getting drafted in the NBA. If a player has failing grades and is ruled ineligible, can they sue because it could stop them from getting drafted in the NBA. If a player is a star, does that mean they don’t have to follow any of the rules that everyone else have to follow.
If this had been some random student, he would likely have been expelled – and would have no recourse despite the fact that no longer being able to go to Illinois can effect him in the job market.
Many of the people who will be drafted are not even in college – there are plenty of international players or G-league players who will get drafted. After the season is over, the NBA holds sessions to evaluate players – he could have gone to those without finishing the season at Illinois.
I understand legally why the judge ruled in Shannon’s favor – and the whole world of NIL makes it even more complicated to evaluate if the player is simply a student or if they are an employee. I am sure the judge didn’t want to be anywhere near the case as it creates problems no matter what they chose.
But it was still the wrong decision. Basketball is not a civil right. Just because leading them through the NCAA tournament could make his draft stock rise doesn’t change that he has any rights to be on that court. Does he get to sue the NBA when the draft happens before his case is decided and teams don’t want to risk a high draft pick on a player who might miss the season because he is in jail? It could cost him millions.
But apparently everyone else is responsible to give him the opportunity for those millions. He can do whatever he wants and as long as he scores 20 points per game, he should be paid by everyone.
So, as much as I would like to root for Illinois, I can’t root for Shannon. I guess I can root for Shannon to get in foul trouble, have to sit, and see one of the other Illinois players lead them to victory. And then maybe he will sue the referees for calling bad fouls that made him miss part of the game.
Then again, it probably is a moot point. With the Huskies beating everyone by double digits, my feelings probably don’t matter as Connecticut appears to be on their own mission to destroy everyone.